I know many escorts have a warning on their page saying if a client asks for BB they will be blocked. Despite having this I get contacted daily for it.

Just wondering how you guys are responding to clients who still ask. Or do you just ignore and block? X

Thank you for sharing. I was pmsing yesterday and snapped at one. I took find it disgusting to be with someone who asks.

I have noticed a large increase in people asking for it. Infact, I had someone ask to creampie me yesterday. It is frustrating, and I do state that I will block anyone who asks, so I do. I used to tell them that I don't offer BB, but now I just save my breath and block.

I don't get asked for services I don't offer that often (although I've had it more than usual over the last few weeks - OWO and RO specifically and each time in person, which isn't what the OP is asking about) and my site and ads are clear which services these are. I've never understood the frothing about BB specifically, tbh - some people offer it and some don't, just like everything else.

I don't see any need to tell punters what your screening methods are or when and why they'll get blocked, I just do it. I suspect that having text on your ads that does might put at least some of them on the wind up (which applies to ranty/whiny profile text generally), plus knowing they're blocked (or likely to be) makes it more likely they'll just get a new number and you have to start again.

I quite simply tell them no, I try and keep it light and friendly and will often give a small chuckle along with not in my bookings hun sorry I don't play bare ever., I will also if they are trying to hump me put my hand over my bits and twist my hips to one side and tell them the pink bits don't meet till the cover is on.

I've had very very few issues with this approach and only had to actually stop 2 guys and ask them to leave in my 9 years working.

If I get the I can't stay hard with a condom then I tell them it will be oral and hand only then. The same goes for condom wilt, there are many ways to satisfaction that do not involve my fanny and it's always a no to Cumming over it as well.

If they have been an utter pain in the arse then I save them as such and simply don't allow them another booking or block them.

Thanks yes I usually bat it off, tell them I don't have unprotected intercourse with anyone, explain better safe than sorry. Some get the message, one person argued insistent he would show me his results, another mentioned it 3 times,

The most alarming was when a regular thought he was inside me without a condom on, he remarked 'I didn't think you did it without'. I stopped to check yes condom still on, but for that split second my heart skipped a beat. I must have looked so horrified he apologised both then and later. Can't remember the exact sequence but we'd stopped then restarted intercourse, he either hadn't noticed I'd replaced the condom, or he thought I'd removed without replacing. But he was quite happy thinking he was condomless. My horror was two fold, part safety but also because I've never ever had unprotected intercourse with my husband (we have always used condoms. If I would ever have unprotected I'd want it to be with him, but this won't happen whilst I'm having sex with other partners.

To go back to the OK I tend to judge each enquiry individually, depends on how the person comes across. If he's been difficult or an idiot it's an easy reason to stop and refuse. What's very interesting are those who reason 'You don't offer it so I figure you are safe to have unprotected sex with', or the enquirer says they are married 'therefore clean and safe for unprotected intercourse'. 

Escorting is a vulnerable job and I just can't bring myself to trust a client who doesn't even care about his own life.

Smoking is more likely to kill Joe Punter than anything he picks up from having sex - do you turn away smokers on the grounds that 'they don't care about their life?'

Recently I've started checking their feedback to see if they had seen any escorts who offer BB before letting them book

What is the point though? You don't know whether the punter had unprotected sex during his booking any more than you know whether or not the 'acceptable' punter you saw later on had fully protected sex and oral and then went out on the weekend and shagged one or more randoms without using condoms at all? Or does BB on the sly with his regular, and so on; all you'll achieve is driving yourself round the bend.

How other people have sex and with whom is not our concern, and if you're this obsessive about it it suggests that you're not comfortable with the risks you're taking - why not just concentrate on protecting yourself? I couldn't care less what any of them are doing outwith their bookings, because I just treat them all like they're riddled

Apart from anything else if you only plan to see punters who have AW feedback you can look at, you're blocking off every one who doesn't have an account there and making it hard to advertise in other places. There are things I'm happy to let cost me money, but this isn't one of them.

Smoking is more likely to kill Joe Punter than anything he picks up from having sex - do you turn away smokers on the grounds that 'they don't care about their life?'

What is the point though? You don't know whether the punter had unprotected sex during his booking any more than you know whether or not the 'acceptable' punter you saw later on had fully protected sex and oral and then went out on the weekend and shagged one or more randoms without using condoms at all? Or does BB on the sly with his regular, and so on; all you'll achieve is driving yourself round the bend.

How other people have sex and with whom is not our concern, and if you're this obsessive about it it suggests that you're not comfortable with the risks you're taking - why not just concentrate on protecting yourself? I couldn't care less what any of them are doing outwith their bookings, because I just treat them all like they're riddled

Apart from anything else if you only plan to see punters who have AW feedback you can look at, you're blocking off every one who doesn't have an account there and making it hard to advertise in other places. There are things I'm happy to let cost me money, but this isn't one of them.

A client who smokes isn't going to suddenly pressure you into smoking in a meet and get violent when you refuse and smoking is only a risk over time. With STD's all it takes is the one time. So its an obvious difference.

Of course I am not comfortable risking my health which is why I'm concentrating on protecting myself from boundary pushing clients. A Punter who frequent BB escorts is a bigger risk than others again obvious reasons.

Just having an account isn't enough to book me. I don't see clients with no recent positive feedback. I am a single mum so risking my health/safety an unfair risk to my children.

I'm sorry if you read my post as a criticism of how you work. It was not my intention. Everyone does things differently. Just because I do it my way is not a criticism of you or anyone other than the boundary pushing punters I have to deal with.
.

Just like there is a market for BB escorts there is also a massive market for safe sex escorts. Each to their own but escorts should be allowed to make the choice to have safe sex and still offer FS not just massage or HR.

I just wish client who wants BB would just stick to BB escorts. There are so many. Why bother the ones who's profile state that they passionately against it.

BB or safe sex isn't the issue here. The issue is clients boundary pushing before or actually in meets for services escorts don't offer.