There's no such thing as 'living off immoral earnings', and never has been. It's a myth 
.
I don't like to disagree with you Amy as you are very knowledgeable but there is a law that has been used to prosecute unless my eyes deceiving me. lol
S.30 Sexual Offences Act 1956 states:-
"1; It is an offence for a man knowingly to live wholly or
in part on the earnings of prostitution.
Read a case in the Telegraph...
Last year a police officer stumbled across Jilly's website and officers raiding the flat found a male client in a compromising position with Jilly. The client, who had earlier telephoned Chubb (her partner) to ask if Jilly was available, was being given a massage when they were interrupted by the officers.
In another raid Jilly's home was targeted and officers took away books, mobiles, computers and every piece of paper they could find. "They arrested Mike; they said he'd been living off immoral earnings," she told me.
Last week Chubb, a retired Army major, was found guilty in Dorchester Crown Court of living off the immoral earnings of a prostitute, given an eight-month suspended sentence and ordered to surrender the ?15,000 he earned from the 18-month venture. He was also ordered to pay ?250 costs.
The judge, Recorder Dermond O'Brien, told him: "Despite the criminal nature of your activities you probably did not realise you were doing anything significantly wrong. It was an act of breathtaking naivety. How somebody of your obvious intelligence was able to convince himself of this is something I can only marvel at."
The relationship between Chubb and Jilly has now ended, and she is back living alone. Jilly was not prosecuted because she did not herself solicit. "[The police] had no complaint about what I do," she told me.
From what I gather she was OK working from her site on the internet but he was prosecuted because A. He was her partner B. He knew she was a prostitute and C. He answered her phone when she was busy. She wasn't 'controlled' she was working an independent escort and paying her tax according to the Telegraph story.
