See also the main SAAFE.info site for more Support And Advice For Escorts

Author Topic: Time waster - Peckham, London  (Read 1894 times)

melodybanks

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
Time waster - Peckham, London
« on: 11 September 2020, 09:23:58 pm »
073779845**
No name given, booked by deception, called to false address; *** Bath Close SE15 2JT (a women answered the door) then stopped responding.
Caught him leaving from another side, confronted him and was he very embarrassed. 5’6, overweight, slightly bearded, wore a gold chain, white tank top, white shorts, stubby nose.

SAAFE

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 234
Re: Time waster - Peckham, London
« Reply #1 on: 12 September 2020, 08:31:37 pm »
What does 'booked by deception' mean?

melodybanks

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
Re: Time waster - Peckham, London
« Reply #2 on: 30 December 2020, 06:18:25 pm »
I understand it means they book you not with the intention to see you but for other malicious intentions

amy

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,493
Re: Time waster - Peckham, London
« Reply #3 on: 30 December 2020, 09:41:24 pm »
I understand it means they book you not with the intention to see you but for other malicious intentions

But that doesn't make sense - obviously it was a hoax outcall (that would have been found out to be a hoax with the usual security checks) but that's already detailed in the post? There's no need to post the same thing twice.

melodybanks

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
Re: Time waster - Peckham, London
« Reply #4 on: 31 December 2020, 12:24:37 pm »
I was just answering the question asked...

amy

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,493
Re: Time waster - Peckham, London
« Reply #5 on: 31 December 2020, 06:44:38 pm »
I was just answering the question asked...

OK, but since it was you who made the post it was worth asking if there was something else which this signified, because it's an odd choice of words and suggests that some form of deception took place other than the false address. Obviously it didn't :).