Not sure if this should be in the warnings and wasters, maybe it can be moved if admin see fit? Had an email from a bloke claiming to be disabled which isn't a problem for me, and I do genuinely believe he is, as I can't imagine someone bothering to go into this much detail (or indeed managing to lie still and fake paralysis should he eventually shack up with someone).
The thing which made my blood boil was the "I'm disabled so pity me" card. And things like "I will compensate you if you comply" etc which made me think he was trying to pull a fast one. I said a resounding NO and heard nothing back, which kind of makes it feel like he was talking a load of crap anyway. But I was interested to hear if he's emailed anyone else???
I'm also keen to know your thoughts- anyone reckon this a legitimate request, (as I've not had much experience of paralyzed clients), and I'm being a suspicious, cynical, non-disabled-friendly cow, or was he simply looking for someone dumb enough to BB?
Part of his email:
I don't want to assume anything, so I do need to address one thing.
Because of being partially paralyzed, I have some diminished feeling in my lower body. Because of this, I can still reach an Org, but with a latex/lamb barrier, it does not provide me with the feeling of a complete experience and true Big-Org.
That's why I need One and Only One girl to see for the next 8 to 12 months that I can be bareb**k with everything. I will not see multiple partners. I won't do that. I had a full physical and complete blood workup completed and can show you my documentation stating that I'm completely free of everything. If you would agree to see me, I would assume you would have been tested in the last 6 months as well.
I know this type of special request is not for just anyone. The bottom line is, I do require bare**k-/-no condom. I'm fortunate to be able to afford your rates, so I?d be willing to compensate you above your normal rate if you're willing to spend time with me and fulfill my special type of request.
Anyone else received it? Bollocks or not?