We are a new massage establishment opening very soon in a brand new sea view apartment in Southampton (just 90 minutes from London). We are run by an all girl team.

We are looking for an attractive, well presented, English speaking masseuse to join our team on part or full time basis.

Why would the lady have to be attractive if is just massage?

For arguments sake, even if there were, our business would not be targeted.

I wouldn't be so cocky sure myself.

Hi Holly, RR,
One can never be completely sure, you are right. But I am pretty sure because I've done my homework and I have the experience behind me. I know full well about Ocean Village and EXACTLY why it went down. It is necessary to be confident and self-assured when you invest time and money in to a business... otherwise I wouldn't be setting this up. There is a fine line between confidence and arrogance and it's your  prerogative if you feel I've stepped over it. I've invested a lot of my hard earned money as a masseuse in to the apartment, massage beds, decor, furniture, lighting, music system, etc. and location is one thing I did a lot of research about. RR, there is a distinct difference between Ocean Village's set up and ours but the most salient is that we will not be offering escort services (FACT) and our website does NOT suggest otherwise.
Nina

Hello Nameless,
I'm sorry you feel that way (really) but I do feel that's a bit judgemental. I believe I have good manners and I firmly believe what goes around comes around so I try my best to be good and fair to people in my life and also to those who are not.  And due to strict parental upbringing in my formative years, I am incapable of lying... perhaps that's why I'm squinty! All I've tried to do is give honest replies and I will readily accept any criticism and try to learn from it. I am sure everybody on this forum knows there are risks attached to massage work and escort work including raids. I have learnt that putting an ad up in the spamming den is a pretty redundant exercise so I have amended my post. I will stick to word of mouth. I'm still happy to contribute to the forum and hope I can do in some meaningful way... because I appreciate what it is for now.
Nina
x

I just asked someone who is a copper (I know, I know) to look at the site

[removed]

After he finished talking about the slightly odd area around where the lady's arm meets her bust...

He then said that as a man and also as a law enforcer, he would see the site as potentially offering sexual massages as well as sensual ones.

Maybe if you wish to ensure other men and indeed law enforcers do not view it as he does, you need to change a few things on your site? It will not stop an eye being kept on you, but it will help you attract the right sort of customers surely?

I appreciate that I know NOTHING of massage, nor actually anything about escorting really, but just a word to the wise, based on what a man perceived your site to be.   

He then said that as a man and also as a law enforcer, he would see the site as potentially offering sexual massages as well as sensual ones.

I agree,  it looks like a semi high-class escort business posing as a "tantric massage" place to avoid problems. I would definately tone it down (the website) and give it a more "holistic look/approach"  in order to gain some "massage credibility".

Amy, thank you for your post.

It's my strict intention to remain within the boundaries of the law so in that respect I would be grateful for your further advice.
It's not a straight forward massage, it's a sensual one but there is no hand relief, in fact no touching of the genitals (I know it's something I need to make clear on the website).  There is a market for this, I know from my own experience in London. There is body to body contact though. In the eyes of the law, does that constitute prostitution? And if it does, then would I be within the boundary of the law if only one masseuse stayed and conducted massages on the premises?

With reference to your last question, it was a mistake to be advertising on a sex workers forum, a stupid error, agreed.