Well since you're back, the least you could do is answer some of the very valid points made above? Or could you just not sit still any longer without coming back to bluster and rant about how mean we all are?
Whether or not women in the sex industry are exploited (and I would imagine very few are exploited by online directories, bar the odd stolen picture - apart from anything else, the popular sites which can successfully charge us to use them tend to be able to do so because they work, since there are so many free alternatives out there) is nothing to do with anything - people in all sectors are exploited.
There is a huge difference between telling people that putting an ad up won't guarantee them any work (which is so obvious you may as well tell them night follows day) and misleading them by pretending there is a market for something when there is not. Did you read any of the thread you have been repeatedly linked to?
Sites which lie to potentially vulnerable people, male or female, about there being work for them when there isn't (as with 'non-sexual escorting' sites, in the latter case) to part them from their cash are treated here with exactly the contempt and derision they deserve, and to try and justify this by arguing that because it's a smaller amount it's OK to con people out of it is beyond belief. You've actually been treated extremely politely, the reason being that your site appears to be the result of a total lack of industry knowledge or research coupled with a few half baked assumptions and some misplaced optimism. In other words, you're the village idiot rather than the child catcher.
Are you going to answer the questions above now?