But surely it could have came from anywhere? I didn’t say clienteye. It could have been another escort?

It could have done but as some punters know about CE, it's always best to not say anything. Why have a conversation with this idiot - just block him.

Slave, did you say on here that you were banned before? Or is this the same ban?

You told him he was reported, he contacted us complaining and he knew the contents of the report description (i.e. regarding theft), you were the previous one to search him and he tells us it was you who told him, the search history data we have and your admission in your previous post confirms this.

Because of this, we have had to deal with 24 emails from him today, and we are being threatened with defamation.

This incident and your previous block for sharing report details with a client (friend) in Dec 2022 has resulted now, in a permanent ban from ClientEye

We will comment no further.

See Slave. Also I hope you reported the rape so other women are aware cos I can't see any. I am sorry you went through that but other women need to be warned. You can't use CE so do it on this site.

This member's username is 'Slavetolove'. Please address other members appropriately or use the quote function.

But surely it could have came from anywhere? I didn’t say clienteye. It could have been another escort?

How long have you been working? As you've been banned from a hotel and now CE. Maybe still learning the ropes? Gut instinct is best and CE just confirms it. I'll look at how old the reports are and what it's for. Sometimes girls do put malicious reports in, you can't rely on it 100%. I saw someone the other day with about 5 but none of them gave enough information about why he was a timewaster etc. So I decided to see him and he was absolutely lovely. I also saw someone who was "dangerous " but I had a feeling he'd be ok and he was. If I get a bad feeling and go ahead with the booking, it always ends up a troublesome booking. He might have given your number to them.

@clienteye if I were you, I won't comment  any further on this ban issue of Slavetolove
Ps @clienteye has the right to operate her business the way she sees fit to keep other escorts safe and make adjustments when necessary.
I can see some posts on this thread are against this app. Please if you don't like or use it, stop condemning it.
So what if escorts have been working without it for yrs, and so what if escorts use as part of their booking process.

Where in the rules does it state we have to call members by their full names - or is it just me that you're targetting?
Why is it bizarre that I suggest that some men know about this app? Not ALL punters know about it so why am I now being "bizarre"? Should I be saying that every single punter knows about the CE app? Or have I read that incorrectly?

I'd love to know what wording on this thread is suggesting that Slave should be blamed for men's bad behaviour? That's a pretty bad accusation after all.

As for the comment about sniping towards Slave because I think her behaviour isn't proper after being raped is a plain awful accusation. It would just be helpful to warn other women about this scumbag.

Amy, you do get things wrong. Eg: thinking that CE are in the same legal boat as you for one. You snipe at people on here for daring to use towels for punter massages. I could go on.

I expect I'll be banned or have my posts moderated before they go on now but I'm good with the "delete my profile/account tab.
The reason certain people here hate CE is because their working profiles are known and they are touting for business by saying, look I don't use CE so come and see me. The app also takes away from the reports on this forum so there's an element of envy there, too.

I won't derail the thread further but touting 🤣

For clarity; we regularly edit posts here - mostly in the warnings section, but not exclusively - where posters have mentioned punters being on this app whether they say so directly or by way of twee euphemisms like 'reports'. So the never-to-be-broken rule of not mentioning the contents of these isn't panning out quite as intended even though it breaks the rules here which require warnings to be first person. We don't ban vulnerable people who need support for doing so, though.

If you Google 'escort safety warnings', which admittedly is the only thing I tried because it's Sunday and I have better things to do, the app is on the front page below NUM, SAAFE and NSWP, amongst others. I suppose you could call it hiding in plain sight, but given that Google is available to all it's pretty much just being in plain sight.

In addition, I can think of one sex worker we've banned in the last five years (it's probably longer if I looked) and we have a handful on permanent premod. All of these are because they caused so much trouble on the forum (disruptive, aggressive and off topic posting to the point that their presence affected the use of it for others) and created so much work for us that leaving them to get on with it was untenable when they made no effort to post within the rules despite repeated warnings.

When we have posts from people who don't use this app, posts from people who do but just to confirm what they know already and people who are talking about giving up working when they can't use it I'm staggered that anybody thinks the first situation is the problematic one.

I think that's everything. This thread will remain locked today and be unlocked tomorrow - most threads in this section would be left to sink without a trace but since some members find it useful as a means of communication, from then on, we'll play it by ear.