I noticed the "WITH OR WITHOUT" section on the Home:

it says:

However something made me feel ill at ease with the idea of giving clients oral sex without a condom.  Don't get me wrong, within my personal sex life with partners I choose rather than those that pay me to provide a service I adore and revel in making a man cum into my mouth. I consider it to be one of the most intimate arousing & fulfilling acts that a man & woman can take part in. Maybe & probably that is part of the reason for my natural instinctive reluctance to provide it as a service? Who knows? I also had concerns about the risk involved regarding STI's. Having had a friend that had been unlucky enough to be infected orally and witnessing how painful and unattractive the effects could be.
So I decided from day one not to offer oral without protection.

think most guys wouldn't know one can catch something off OWO does that mean the responsibility is all on us as to enlighten/educate punters into encouraging the safe sexual health practices?  Or do you agree to disagree so long as two people involved in the deeds are happy about whatever they decided to do?


any views would be welcome 

For most men having sex with men, using a condom for oral sex is very rare. Almost one for those with rubber fetishes, in fact. Remember there's more oral sex between men than fucking.

I like doing it, a lot. It's my favourite thing to do with men. I do like the taste, and I don't like the taste of rubber, so I won't do covered.

I acknowledge that it's a risk for some things, obviously won't do it if there's any sores / pus / extra sensitivity, and make sure the clinic knows to check my throat (even though I hate that!) No problems so far.

If other people make different choices, yippee. It's what free will is for.

My experience concurs with Richard's. My appointments tend to be more oral oriented and I love it. I am not keen on throat swabs either but after 7 years of them with no problems detected then I too am happy with the level of risk I take.   

Quote from: Richard on 21 September 2007, 11:00:51 pm

For most men having sex with men, using a condom for oral sex is very rare. Almost one for those with rubber fetishes, in fact. Remember there's more oral sex between men than fucking.

I like doing it, a lot. It's my favourite thing to do with men. I do like the taste, and I don't like the taste of rubber, so I won't do covered.

I acknowledge that it's a risk for some things, obviously won't do it if there's any sores / pus / extra sensitivity, and make sure the clinic knows to check my throat (even though I hate that!) No problems so far.

If other people make different choices, yippee. It's what free will is for.

My experience concurs with Richard's. My appointments tend to be more oral oriented and I love it. I am not keen on throat swabs either but after 7 years of them with no problems detected then I too am happy with the level of risk I take.   

That is a Good track record thank you for sharing your personal take on this topic it was much appreciated 

Quote from: MM on 22 September 2007, 03:17:54 pm

 So naturally if someone does not want OWO then he won't be visiting someone who offers OWO if you appreciate the logic?  In my view, there are diverse views on this naturally. 

Not necessarily. I have one customer I've been seeing for years that I see every few months. He's well aware that I offer OWO. He always asks for oral with. He also doesn't kiss much. But as I say, he's well aware of my other services, but I still see him 2-3 times a year inbetween other ladies. So the thinking doesn't always follow logically.

that makes so much sense Brandy thank you for your thoughts on this. xxx

the logic as to why some women/wgs would insist on covered only service is on the supposition that punters may or may not have picked up something either via OWO/RO/deep kiss and in the worst scenario via dodgy penetrative sex i.e. accidents with no appropriate follow-up such as a visit to the GUM/condom burst=inappropriate fitting etc/"in the heat of the moment" scenario where body fluids had accidentally been exchanged etc.

knowing your punter insists on all covered service then think that's entirely reasonable to consider he's practicing the safe sex with someone who is known to offer OWO.

what I really tried to mean earlier was...as a trend, more "adventurous type" punter will seek out escorts who may offer adventurous service (OWO and such like) but I take your point.

 

Oh Yes I have read that comment. How interesting!

I'm a bit undecided hence this topic but tbh it's great if punters want all covered service that's risk minimised for me also.  it just gives me peace of mind.

wonder however how to go about advertising this side of things. 

I usually mention "safe sex" only but it usually means about covered sex but punters might think what about OWO. 

what is "safe sex" that is a question. safe sex to one person means different things to another.