I have just searched, and could not find a single case of anyone getting HIV via spunk in the eye, ever. Ditto for Hep of any kind. It is a theoretical risk rather than a common one, whereas infection rates for unprotected vaginal or anal sex are much more concrete.

Chlamydial conjunctivitis is more common, but easily treated with antibiotics, as with oral or genital chlamydia.

If YOU don't want to offer facials, then don't. Lots of escorts don't. I like them, so I offer them.

"The estimated annual number of needlestick and sharps injuries in the United States is around 385,000. These injuries may expose healthcare workers to more than 20 different bloodborne pathogens, the most important of which are hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). All blood, body fluids, secretions, and excretions, except sweat, can contain transmissible infectious agents. The risk of developing HIV after a needlestick injury is about 0.3% (after a splash 0.09%), the risk for hepatitis B is 6% to 30%, and the risk for hepatitis C after a needlestick is about 1.8 % (much lower after a splash). The following circumstances increase the risk of infection:

    A hollow-bore needle caused the injury.
    The area of exposure was penetrated deeply.
    Blood was injected during the injury.
    The patient has a high viral load."

Souce: americannursetoday

Actually getting body fluid in the eyes is something of concern for health care providers.
I remember an episode of House where one of the doctors working with House got a splash of blood to her face from a HIV positive patient, and there was a drama around that for that and the next few episodes because she didn't knew if she was infected.
There are plenty more articles and posts in nursing forums about this subject.

I think you have had your answers,not sure why you have just copied and pasted the last article?

Wind up merchant springs to mind

But that article still doesn't quote an actual case of someone getting hiv from bodily fluid in the eye,nor did the episode of House.
It is technically possible to get HIV in the way's you have described but no documented evidence that someone 100 per cent got HIV that way do you see what I mean?
Nobody is saying you can't post but maybe popping up seemingly random articles without saying why is rathet confusing and can be taken the wrong way.
Maybe just ask a direct question if you have a concern rather than quoting something on the net?

A non escort asking what 'we' think about it....really?  I think il do what I do earn a nice little bit, get tested every month and still not caught anything in my throat, im not sure why its important to you what other people offer, lots of people offer anal, I dont so what

This is the thing I dont offer FS but I am not going to start spouting incorrect information like facials are as risky as bareback, live and let live 

I won't post anything else. I've read this forum for quite a while, now that I'm about to start I felt like I should create an account and start contributing to the forum. But I really feel like I'm not welcomed to post.

Feel free to post genuine questions. Don't copy and paste irrelevant articles in an attempt to back up your ridiculous assertions that doing facial is "just as risky" as bareback 

I am on a phone, so I will just say BEHAVE.

There are clear rules & a report button for when they are broken.

"I won't post anything else but you should read first!

Not my intention to pass this idea, my intention was to say that with facials, if and only if you get spunk in your eye you have the same risk as bareback.

I even apologized if a passed the wrong idea! My intention was not to compare facials as a WHOLE but the specific situation of when getting spunk inside the eye!"

There is my 'rude' PM. Your answer was so 'courteous'.

It's hard to think that I'm not being attacked when most of what I write is being taken out of context or misused for the propose of attacking me. Things are being used time and time again, even after I tried to explain that it was not my intention to give that idea and explain exactly what I meant.
I can accept that my first post could give the idea that I was comparing facials as a whole to bareback, but like I posted 2 times already it was not my intention!
And when I try do defend myself I'm attacked again for it! No problem. I really don't need to explain myself to anyone. I'll stay in the lurking side and stop posting once and for all.

"I won't post anything else but you should read first!

I even apologized if a passed the wrong idea! My intention was not to compare facials as a WHOLE but the specific situation of when getting spunk inside the eye!"

There is my 'rude' PM. Your answer was so 'courteous'.

It's hard to think that I'm not being attacked when most of what I write is being taken out of context or misused for the propose of attacking me. Things are being used time and time again, even after I tried to explain that it was not my intention to give that idea and explain exactly what I meant.
I can accept that my first post could give the idea that I was comparing facials as a whole to bareback, but like I posted 2 times already it was not my intention!
And when I try do defend myself I'm attacked again for it! No problem. I really don't need to explain myself to anyone. I'll stay in the lurking side and stop posting once and for all.

Nobody is attacking you, we are all just disagreeing with you, theres a difference. If you want to write facials are as risky as bareback, expect replies stating that your wrong, just like you have attempted to prove us wrong with your online quotes.