See also the main SAAFE.info site for more Support And Advice For Escorts

Author Topic: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?  (Read 1948 times)

English Green

  • Guest
Re: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?
« Reply #15 on: 15 June 2022, 11:32:14 am »
Yes, I’ve heard about this being used as code for unprotected penetration. A ‘real’ or ‘true’ GFE can also be used similarly.

Oh god yes i would remove that word because it's a word or phrase that obviously is becoming more popular for bareback. Maybe it's a game and ploy to mention it discreetly in among other words and try in the booking to put it in out of the blue without protection before you realise what he is doing then he justifies it by saying i mentioned " natura in our conversationl"

I actually use the word ‘natural’ on my website. This thread has prompted me to remove it.

Recently I have had a few ask about how often I get tested etc during their initial enquiry. I decline these outright as I am certain they’re only asking because there’s a huge probability they will either tamper with the condom or remove it completely.

Escortx

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 895
  • Escort
Re: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?
« Reply #16 on: 15 June 2022, 11:51:56 am »
Whenever someone asks for a full gfe I think that could mean bareback I'm not sure

SheffSW

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
Re: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?
« Reply #17 on: 15 June 2022, 11:52:49 am »
I have heard it a few times. The first time was when I was very new but luckily I figured it out as he first asked if I was STI tested and went on about being "immaculately clean" and having a very recent negative test. Had it a few more times since then but now I'm more aware to look out for it and they tend to specify no condoms when they say it. My main issue is clients who don't mention it at all during communications then ask or otherwise try for it during the actual meeting.

Lady Frog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
Re: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?
« Reply #18 on: 16 June 2022, 12:58:33 am »
Aw was originally created as a specialised bareback directory. The other various sexual services just hid that.... a bit like camaflauge.

Wait...

What??

Adultwork was created to be a bareback niche sex services directory?
A woman, especially, if she have the misfortune of knowing anything, should conceal it as well as she can. - Jane Austen

saltysweet

  • Guest
Re: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?
« Reply #19 on: 16 June 2022, 08:57:52 am »
Yes LF  :), that was it's unique selling point/primary interest. It was the 'go-to' site for BB services. Still is if that's your cup of chai.
It didn't excluded protected services though.
« Last Edit: 16 June 2022, 11:09:43 am by saltysweet »

English Green

  • Guest
Re: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?
« Reply #20 on: 16 June 2022, 12:55:03 pm »
Yes LF  :), that was it's unique selling point/primary interest. It was the 'go-to' site for BB services. Still is if that's your cup of chai.
It didn't excluded protected services though.

I remember when adultwork first came around years ago and it was promoting bareback and i remember at the time the shock horror from women and some clients. Obviously it is a service more women provide now for sure, i seen huge changes over the years that more and more gets offered that previously nobody or not many would do.

Lady Frog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
Re: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?
« Reply #21 on: 16 June 2022, 03:38:37 pm »
Obviously it is a service more women provide now for sure

I don't even entertain discussion about bare back so I wasn't aware of that. But that is very disappointing to hear I guess
A woman, especially, if she have the misfortune of knowing anything, should conceal it as well as she can. - Jane Austen

Lady Frog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
Re: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?
« Reply #22 on: 16 June 2022, 03:40:13 pm »
Yes LF  :), that was it's unique selling point/primary interest. It was the 'go-to' site for BB services. Still is if that's your cup of chai.
It didn't excluded protected services though.

Well thanks for the info  :-X that's disgusting I feel a bit sick now. If I knew that before joining adultwork I probably would never have signed up yuck
A woman, especially, if she have the misfortune of knowing anything, should conceal it as well as she can. - Jane Austen

amy

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,512
Re: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?
« Reply #23 on: 16 June 2022, 03:56:32 pm »
Aw was originally created as a specialised bareback directory.

I don't remember it quite like that and nor do I remember Adultwork 'promoting' bareback especially, only that it was the first to allow those who were offering it (alongside all the other perfectly legal services they offered) to advertise the fact openly, rather than the adopting the nauseatingly prim and hypocritical approach of other directories at the time and banning any ad which mentioned unprotected vaginal or anal sex whilst welcoming ads offering unprotected oral.

IIRC the site was set up as an all-encompassing platform offering a mishmash of different things including webcam, porn pictures/clips, phone chat and in person services. Not that it's in any way relevant to the thread topic :)

thickthighs

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
Re: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?
« Reply #24 on: 16 June 2022, 04:25:46 pm »
I don't remember it quite like that and nor do I remember Adultwork 'promoting' bareback especially, only that it was the first to allow those who were offering it (alongside all the other perfectly legal services they offered) to advertise the fact openly, rather than the adopting the nauseatingly prim and hypocritical approach of other directories at the time and banning any ad which mentioned unprotected vaginal or anal sex whilst welcoming ads offering unprotected oral.

IIRC the site was set up as an all-encompassing platform offering a mishmash of different things including webcam, porn pictures/clips, phone chat and in person services. Not that it's in any way relevant to the thread topic :)

Me neither and I’ve been off and on it 10 years

saltysweet

  • Guest
Re: Has anybody had clients disguising bareback with other terms?
« Reply #25 on: 16 June 2022, 07:22:56 pm »
Amy, you put it better than I did. I agree. Yes, it was the first to enable providers to present it to buyers openly and honestly, that's more accurate than what I said  :)

Indeed it's legal and personal choice. And a hot button topic I know.
« Last Edit: 16 June 2022, 07:43:30 pm by saltysweet »