He tried to book me a few years ago then I spoke to friends about it who'd been in the industry longer then me & consensus was that he's a freebie hunter. I addressed this issue directly to him & he affirmed that was the case so I cancelled his booking. He's a cheeky prick, thinking he could just turn up & not offer any money.

There seem to be a lot of laws now a days dealing with harassment, stalking,  revenge porn, voyeurism, I wonder if he has broken any of them?

He listed me on his site, took my photo off aw and put that I work in a down turn hotel in bham and that I sometimes tour in london, which I never have, I dont like to advertise too many places so requested he take me off, his book was meant to be brilliant in the days before internet

Did he take you off? X

He won't take you off as long as you're advertising anywhere.

But he will make corrections.

Yes this is what I found. Don't think I have ever had anyone ever contact me from there. Although I don't always ask where they found me anyway as they can never remember

He took my number and and photos off, he had to, because he didnt have permission to share them, but he was cool about it

I just had a quick look at his site and under the cities he has actually put a description of where the flats are situated!! i.e 'a resident authority flat', 'top floor tenement flat'!! that is bang out of order & its hardly discrete!!! I think every wg should have a look & see if any of you are on it & if it'd be obvious to other people that its you that works from there!! What a wanker, clearly discretion isn't his thing.

I've received a couple of bookings via his site, I've met him in person for coffee, never asked me for a freebie. I did however make sure the meeting was somewhere neutral so there could be no confusion.

Perhaps I'm not attractive enough 

Or more likely he knows you are smart and that you wouldn't do it.

Everyone is looking at this from our side. In terms of dealing with him it might be easier to get legal action taken against him as a consumer. Assuming the site is a UK site he is charging his members for access to flase or misleading information. Surely trading standards or some consumer group would be able to help if the goal is to get the site closed or at least force him to get consent to advetise.