Don't think I could ever receive but maybe could maybe give if I didn't like them or they were horrible to me. Maybe that's the wrong attitude to have but just wondered if anyone else have these feelings.
Your looking at it the wrong way. Hear me out:
Most guys who want to be peed on request this in their comms. If they are horrible to you in comms, you wont accept the booking.
You cant really pee on a guy who has been horrible to you in person because its something they would of requested beforehand, so irrespective of the situation, you will have made a prior arrangement/agreement for WS. You will actually find that the majority of guys who want to be peed on also want to be Dominated by you - they enjoy a bossy bitchy women telling them what to do/tease and denial/degrading etc. In some ways, it is a roleplay, but then there are those who partake in D/s as a lifestyle. So they wont be horrible to you - they are paying you to be horrible to them, if you get my drift....
I have peed on a few guys. The first guy I peed on, it was wicked! We had such a great connection even though I didnt fuck him, he just wanted a strict D/s service and I was really excited to experience what it was like peeing on someone for the first time!!! Ive done it several times: some I connected with and others I didnt. But the point Im making is that you wouldnt have the choice to pee on a guy if hes horrible to you. He either wants to be peed on or he doesnt.
Id say give it a try (giving WS). If you dont like it then dont do it again, but if you do go for it, try and do it in a shower/bath. It gets really messy if you do it anywhere else