No maybe not, but I know I always objected to the idea that people on minimum wage (which used to include me, and still includes plenty of people I know) were contributing to things such as this for people who were earning ?100K+ a year, and I still do object to that; my post was specifically regarding those on high incomes still expecting state help towards something which unlike healthcare and protection from harm/crime prevention I do not personally view as basic human need/necessity, and that is having children*.
I realise there aren't any easy solutions to any of it, but I don't think the country as a whole has the spare cash to throw around on those who don't need it, and are in the process spreading the actual available amounts a lot thinner for those who do.
Anyway, it was me who took it off topic, so it's nobody's fault but my own, but does anybody actually have a clue what the OP is talking about?
*EDIT: I should probably point out before somebody else does, that I am aware the species has to be continued somehow, and that clearly isn't what I meant.
Topic: Feminism and media portrayals of women. (Read 5924 times)