A couple of recent threads have reminded me of two projects which are on my 'to do' list which I'd like some assistance with.

1. One of the arguments used by the antis is that the sex industry portrays a single image of women which other women feel pressure to conform to (and which all men are expected to find only desirable) . Obviously the success of escorts who are not compliant Barbie clones shows this to be crap. Would anyone like to have their site linked to as examples of people who do not match the stereotype? I'm thinking of attitude and age as well as body shape, hair etc etc etc.

2. For those who have reviews posted somewhere public - if you can remember the booking concerned, would you be interested in having your side published? This would be done anonymously, including mixing up bits of the client's reviews to make it impossible very difficult to link who said what about who. (It is not as if many reviews are not similar!) I'm interested in good and bad experiences: the point is to show some reality, even in a Rashomon sense of different participants having different truths.

No promises that anything will happen soon!

Me too, you can use me. Short, mature, brunette. (I will even tell you my real age!) 
Got reviews too.

Would your research also indicate the absolute atrocity that goes on in the gay world? E.G. that all gay men prefer the hairless white men portrayed in every fucking gay magazine? Bullshit

That the only desirable gay men are Latin and White men with buff bodies? Bullshit

That you're not a desirable (or real) gay Black person if you dont have a big dick (or ass), and are HIV+? Bullshit

Sincerest apologies if that is off topic, but unfortunently its not just women who the 'barbie' look goes for, Its also the 'Ken' look that supposedly every gay man likes. And it makes me VOMIT to read gay magazines (and even many escort and porn sites) and see page after page of White guys, as if they are the only ones who exist. Dont get me wrong, yes many of them are hot...but what does that say about the community? Thats its the ONLY thing considered hot? Hell to the ****** f*cking no!

Bull-fucking-shiiiit   

I have way too much ass and thighs to be even remotely classified as a barbie type. Not to mention I am a lovely mocha-skinned complexion, with big brown sparkly eyes, and a cheeky smile. 
You may use my link as well.

I have way too much ass and thighs to be even remotely classified as a barbie type. Not to mention I am a lovely mocha-skinned complexion, with big brown sparkly eyes, and a cheeky smile. 
You may use my link as well.

Hey...now you know they did come out with the caramel colored Barbie's 

As far as I know...all Barbies had big asses LOL. I was looking at a documentry which was showing how Barbie's shape is almost impossible to achieve by any woman. They were so curvaceous LOL

1. One of the arguments used by the antis is that the sex industry portrays a single image of women which other women feel pressure to conform to (and which all men are expected to find only desirable) . Obviously the success of escorts who are not compliant Barbie clones shows this to be crap. Would anyone like to have their site linked to as examples of people who do not match the stereotype? I'm thinking of attitude and age as well as body shape, hair etc etc etc.

Are people actually talking about prostitution when they make this argument? It seems much more relevant to porn and stripping, and while those industries can be more inclusive than people might assume they still primarily favour a small range of body types.

(Of course you're welcome to link to my website if you think it might be helpful.)

We are a couple and I'm dress size 22 so rather unusual I guess , our website address is in my profile:)

Thanks, Emily, I will take a look at it! I don't think there's anything wrong with it, there are many false alerts, but I'll take a look anyway

Don't hijack - PM