Interestingly, the initial voiceover picks 80,000 as the figure. It'd be better to give a range and acknowledge that no-one really knows.
There was a better programme on Prague recently, so I wonder why this one bothered.
The four students section was awful.
Unlike some of the others, they're very happy to plug AW, aren't they? At least once, they fail to blur the on screen site name too. The BBC over-plug Facebook and Twitter, perhaps one day it will be '..and if you'd like to have sex with X, see their AW profile!'
I like the little sneer when she says 'porn star experience'
They also blur the Twitter account name, but not the name.. or the pic of her licking something phallic.
Nice showing the ignorance around the law.
Hello Shelly
I wonder if the words of Chris Armitt, the Merseyside police officer in charge of policy, will be quoted in a court case or two regarding what the police see as ok. It'd would also have been more interesting to get him in a debate with his equivalent in Scotland, for example.
Nothing at all about male and trans escorts...
...and it would have been really good if the programme or the website mentioned support and info places like here. Because there will be some more people starting without a clue.
they should have tried to find typical-age clients - there was a massive emphasis on young people.
This was clearly the spin they'd decided on.
Oh and one of the young fellas, the one with the buddy who she sat and spoke to in their flat, he was on Channel 4's Date my pornstar doc .. I am 99% sure it is him! That annoyed me because if you're going to do a documentary you should vet your interviewees a bit better so holes can't be picked in what you're creating.
Alas, when a programme is done on anything, the young researchers tend to go for the 'round up the usual suspects' approach. It's the only way to explain how Becky gets on TV