Quote from: sammy s on 23 December 2015, 06:02:24 pm

There are multiple posts on this forum about clients being crap in bed, boring in bed, ugly, annoying, deluded, smelly, ridiculous etc. Not sure why this particular post by the op has been analysed to pieces...

Hello, and I'm very sorry that I am keeping this thread rumbling on! However I do think it represents an interesting cross section of views, and I personally am enjoying the intelligent debate and exchange of opinions.

With regards to the above quote, I agree that there have been far worse, and far more revealing posts on here. I think the main difference is that other posts have been about clients that have done something wrong; have been dirty, aggressive, rude, turned up late etc. However this client seems to have done nothing wrong other than wanting a bit of an ego boost I think that's why it sits so badly with some of us that he has been subject to such a personal, vitriolic attack..... that does smack of cruelty slightly (sorry.)

I also agree with those who have mentioned that some of us have been subject to personal attacks on other sites. I think we all agree that if one of us has done something wrong, or not lived up to their side of the bargain yet still accepted money - well that is not right. But to be cut to shreds simply because someone has taken a personal dislike to us - not fair. And I believe that extends to clients too. xx

I agree with everything your saying. I just found her posting style to be really funny far more than what she was actually saying if that makes any sense? X

Quote from: sammy s on 23 December 2015, 06:02:24 pm

There are multiple posts on this forum about clients being crap in bed, boring in bed, ugly, annoying, deluded, smelly, ridiculous etc. Not sure why this particular post by the op has been analysed to pieces...

"...But to be cut to shreds simply because someone has taken a personal dislike to us - not fair. And I believe that extends to clients too. xx..."

The OP was not cut to shreds, her post was, the tone" of it ruffled quite a few feathers.

The Problem with posting on public is that not everyone will agree and your post will be challenged.

(Big deal, this would be such a boring world if we all thought alike)

The post got so long because (unlike other similar posts of crappy clients) this one seemed  cruel, didn't put the WG in a good light  and  it initiated a debate on whether this  forum should be free territory for client bashing because "men who pay for sex deserve getting slagged" (insert irony tone here).

Not all women agreed and that's why the thread reached 8 pages. Some defended the guy in the story  others thought that "since when WG's defend punters!" .

I personally think that men getting slagged for paying for sex is as bad as women getting slagged for having sex in exchange for money. And we already have a lot of that.

And yes, it turned into an interesting debate (IMO). Andit was not the post in itself the most interesting part, but the debate it sparked  (hence the 8 pages). Not all "crappy session" posts spark a debate. But this one did (hi-ho!)


Happy holidays  (Just woke up with a hangover. I've been dancing samba all night. My legs  are f----g killing me).

We are sexual therapists.

The OP was not cut to shreds, her post was, the tone" of it ruffled quite a few feathers.

The Problem with posting on public is that not everyone will agree and your post will be challenged.

(Big deal, this would be such a boring world if we all thought alike)

The post got so long because (unlike other similar posts of crappy clients) this one seemed  cruel, didn't put the WG in a good light  and  it initiated a debate on whether this  forum should be free territory for client bashing because "men who pay for sex deserve getting slagged" (insert irony tone here).

Not all women agreed and that's why the thread reached 8 pages. Some defended the guy in the story  others thought that "since when WG's defend punters!" .

I personally think that men getting slagged for paying for sex is as bad as women getting slagged for having sex in exchange for money. And we already have a lot of that.

And yes, it turned into an interesting debate (IMO). Andit was not the post in itself the most interesting part, but the debate it sparked  (hence the 8 pages). Not all "crappy session" posts spark a debate. But this one did (hi-ho!)

Spot on!