See also the main SAAFE.info site for more Support And Advice For Escorts

Author Topic: Bareback for ?50?  (Read 33190 times)

AngelaManchester

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Bareback for ?50?
« on: 06 September 2011, 10:05:21 am »
I've just cancelled a booking for tomorrow because the guy was being a pain in the arse, requesting all sorts of things which I don't do in bookings of less than an hour and which is clearly stated on my site.

He has positive feedback on AW so I was just reading it out of curiosity, and it transpires he's seen a lady working very close to me who is offering bareback for ?50!  :o  I've seen bareback offered loads of times before on AW, but never for such little money. Not that the money matters - I know most of us wouldn't do it for any amount - but it just shocks me.

Anyway, I obviously had a lucky escape.

River

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,150
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #1 on: 06 September 2011, 02:02:54 pm »
I like AW as you can see if the potential client has feedback from escorts
and if those escorts offer bareback.

Then I just block said potential client. Easy!

MissyNatalie

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #2 on: 06 September 2011, 02:26:10 pm »
Thats just shocking! Some women (and men) have no self-respect. You did have a lucky escape there deffo!

amy

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,516
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #3 on: 06 September 2011, 02:43:14 pm »
What difference does it make, assuming that you use condoms? I assume that every client who comes through the door has unprotected sex with somebody because I have no way of knowing otherwise, and this is one of the reasons I don't offer any unprotected services. Does this mean ladies are assuming that all punters who only have feedback from ladies who puff and bluster about how they'd never ever do such a thing (which has been known to be bollocks) ever never have or have had unprotected sex? What about with civvy women (and men)?

I must admit I can never see the point of this reaction - everybody has a right to select their clients however they want and which ever way makes them feel better, but the idea that a Punter 1 who has feedback from Bareback Barbie is automatically going to be a bad option compared with Punter 2 who just rings and books and could well have shagged half the town, paid or otherwise, is a real fallacy and just promotes a completely false sense of security. With this in mind, I just assume all of them are riddled  ;D.

As for having no self-respect, some people offer unprotected services of varying kinds because they enjoy them and have made an informed choice to do so; this is not illegal and nobody forces anybody else to either partake or do likewise. Just because we might not choose to do the same does not mean anybody has the right to tell other adults what they can and can't do with their own bodies, and we don't have any right to judge them either. There are plenty out there who think we're all filthy scum without us looking down our noses at each other.

naughtyjas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #4 on: 06 September 2011, 03:13:22 pm »
I agree with Amy, there is no point in assuming that just because someone has not had feedback from a girl offering bareback that he has not visited one.

You can only leave feedback if you and the client both use the AW booking system, most of my clients just phone so I have no idea who they have seen. 

I treat them all like they have had bareback sex and are therefore riddled with stds  ;D.

And just because he may have visited someone who offers bareback sex, it might just be that he didn't indulge.  (In a very rose tinted glasses world).

As long as the client practises safe sex with me I really don't care what he does with others.

Jas x

Rooby

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 737
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #5 on: 06 September 2011, 03:23:32 pm »
As long as the client practises safe sex with me I really don't care what he does with others.

Yep!
R xx

Ellie_e

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 272
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #6 on: 06 September 2011, 03:38:17 pm »
What difference does it make, assuming that you use condoms?

Personally I'd worry that if a client was in the habit of BB with other escorts that he might turn around during a booking and hassle me for BB, or 'accidentally' let the condom slip off, or something of the sort...

Your Tera

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 263
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #7 on: 06 September 2011, 03:46:16 pm »
That's my fear, as well...

amy

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,516
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #8 on: 06 September 2011, 04:05:38 pm »
Personally I'd worry that if a client was in the habit of BB with other escorts that he might turn around during a booking and hassle me for BB, or 'accidentally' let the condom slip off, or something of the sort...

The problem with that is that you have no possible way of knowing whether the bloke is in the habit of BB with other prossies, or anybody else. And just because he is or isn't doesn't make him any more or less likely to interfere with a condom - there's plenty who will try that one, and it's more than likely going to be the ones who pick ladies who don't offer unprotected sex as they're more likely to think they won't catch anything. The people who want BB without the hassle will just book ladies who offer it; it's the nasty ones who want to try and get away with something that isn't on the menu we have to watch for all the time.

I've been pestered for BB a handful of times, not many and it's just something we occasionally have to deal with - the most persistent bloke I remember did book me through AW and there was no clue in either his feedbacks or emails that he was going to try this. Being vigilant about condoms is part of the job (and on the flip side I've had clients who tried to insist on wearing two at once, and the tiresome explaining of why this was a bad idea was even more annoying than Mr of-course-I'm-clean-I'm-married).

Dionne

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #9 on: 06 September 2011, 05:48:02 pm »
I agree with Amy I don't block guys who have seen bb girls but I do block them if they enquire about bb on the phone.......

I once had a guy try and convince me to see him for a bb session, I sad why don't you book a bb girl and he said I don't know where theyve been pmsl I said funny that cause I was thinking the same about you!!!!
"but I'm clean promise!" doesn't really cut it with me lol
Xx

AngelaManchester

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #10 on: 06 September 2011, 07:58:19 pm »
No, I didn't know about the barebacking when I cancelled on him (he was just being an arse).  I'd already told him I wasn't seeing him anymore when I read about the bareback girl - I was just shocked at her price.

I know we can never know our clients' sexual histories, irrespective of their feedback on AW or anywhere else - it is for this reason that I'm forever changing my mind about offering OWO  :-\

EmilyJones

  • Member
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,005
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #11 on: 06 September 2011, 08:02:40 pm »
[...] clients who tried to insist on wearing two at once [...]

[...] Mr of-course-I'm-clean-I'm-married [...]

This is like... a grand spectrum of idiocy. ;D Not sure which end's worse!
Disclosure: The other person behind yourescortsite.com

AngelaManchester

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #12 on: 06 September 2011, 08:04:48 pm »
and on the flip side I've had clients who tried to insist on wearing two at once

Tell me this isn't true!  :o

amy

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,516
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #13 on: 06 September 2011, 10:30:34 pm »
and on the flip side I've had clients who tried to insist on wearing two at once

Tell me this isn't true!  :o
Unfortunately it is - I've actually had it happen twice, but the one I remember was an otherwise perfectly sensible gentleman from Boston who I did a London overnight with. It was tedious, to say the least, but I still couldn't believe it (and I thought he was joking to start with, which went down well - he also tried to insist on his own condoms and pulled a face when that wasn't riding too  ::)).

It does make we wonder why he would book me if he actually believed I was so virulent with the galloping pox that one condom wouldn't be enough.

Cat_BBW

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,819
  • Meow.
    • AdultWork Profile
Re: Bareback for ?50?
« Reply #14 on: 07 September 2011, 11:30:06 pm »
In my personal life, many years ago, a sexual partner insisted on using 2 extra thick condoms at the same time during our 20 mins bonking. He had to keep stopping to put new ones on cos the top condom kept splitting. Great.